Nosmo Symposium 2017

October 10, 2017Green room (Groene zaal), Willem C. van Unnikgebouw, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht
Last modified: October 4, 2017

Nosmo Symposium 2017: The application of scientific methods and research results in the social and medical sciences

The basic goal of research methods and statistics is to keep scientific research on the track of high-quality research. The accounting of these methods is considered as a necessity for scientific publications in both medical and social sciences. Among researchers, for a variety of reasons there is a continuous call for better accounting of the scientific methods used: to improve on the comparability of scientific results, to reduce reporting bias, and to promote responsible research practices. Next to that, there is a call to do research that is applicable in a short or long run for medical and societal practices and consequentially, there are requests to account for usability as well. Important qualities are comparability, bias reduction, responsible research practices and applicability. Taking into account present discussions about the quality of published articles in peer reviewed journals bring us to three questions:

• Are the current methodological guidelines sufficient to review and judge the quality of scientific research?
• Is the current practice of accounting in peer-reviewed journals sufficient to detect sloppy practices or fraudulent practices?
• Are there new methodological guidelines developed that can improve the quality and applicability of scientific research?

To discuss these questions leading scientific researchers are invited from the medical field, social sciences and methodology and statistics.

Please register for this event here.

NRIN devotes a great deal of attention to the website’s content and would greatly appreciate your suggestions of documents or links you believe to belong on this website.

This selection is an incomplete convenience sample, and does not reflect NRIN’s vision or opinion. Including an item does not necessarily mean that we agree with the authors nor does it imply we think unmentioned items are of poorer quality.

Please report any suggestions, inaccuracies or nonfunctioning hyperlinks etc. that you discover. Thanks in advance!