How do universities deal with allegations of scientific misconduct?

Last modified: December 7, 2018

In a recent publication by the PRINTEGER project in Science and Public Policy, the authors Serge Horbach, Eric Breit and Svenn-Erik Mamelund use a case study approach to analyse how European Universities respond to cases of alleged scientific misconduct. They show that their responses can be described as instances of sensemaking, sensegiving and sensehiding. Furthermore, they conclude that several aspects of the responses hinder effective learning processes within organisations and their members.

Read the full paper

Horbach, S. P. J. M., Breit, E., & Mamelund, S.-E. (2018). Organisational responses to alleged scientific misconduct: Sensemaking, sensegiving, and sensehiding. Science and Public Policy, doi: 10.1093/scipol/scy068,

NRIN devotes a great deal of attention to the website’s content and would greatly appreciate your suggestions of documents or links you believe to belong on this website.

This selection is an incomplete convenience sample, and does not reflect NRIN’s vision or opinion. Including an item does not necessarily mean that we agree with the authors nor does it imply we think unmentioned items are of poorer quality.

Please report any suggestions, inaccuracies or nonfunctioning hyperlinks etc. that you discover. Thanks in advance!