Commentaries series on Transparency and Accountability in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
In the 70th volume of the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, an interesting and comprehensive series of commentaries on …
“Whistleblowers play an important role diagnosing research misconduct, but often experience severe negative consequences. That is also true for incorrectly accused scientists. Both categories are vulnerable and deserve protection. Whistleblowers must proceed carefully and cautiously. Anonymous whistleblowing should be discouraged but cannot be ignored when the allegations are specific, serious, and plausible. When accused of a breach of research integrity it is important to be as transparent as possible. Sometimes accusations are false in the sense that the accuser knows or should know that the allegations are untrue. A mala fide whistleblower typically does not act carefully and we postulate a typology that may help in detecting them. Striking the right balance between whistleblower protection and timely unmasking false and identifying incorrect accusations is a tough dilemma leaders of research institutions have to face.” Please read the full article here.
An interview with the authors of the articles was published by Retraction Watch, which can be found on http://retractionwatch.com/2017/05/29/not-just-whistleblowers-deserve-protection-misconduct-investigations-say-researchers/
Lex M. Bouter & Sven Hendrix (2017) Both Whistleblowers and the Scientists
They Accuse Are Vulnerable and Deserve Protection, Accountability in Research, 24:6, 359-366,
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1327814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2017.1327814
NRIN devotes a great deal of attention to the website’s content and would greatly appreciate your suggestions of documents or links you believe to belong on this website.
This selection is an incomplete convenience sample, and does not reflect NRIN’s vision or opinion. Including an item does not necessarily mean that we agree with the authors nor does it imply we think unmentioned items are of poorer quality.
Please report any suggestions, inaccuracies or nonfunctioning hyperlinks etc. that you discover. Thanks in advance!Contact